Cosmetic/Esthetic — August 31, 2018

What's in this issue?

Zirconia ceramic cantilever
resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses
es >>

Composite resin, ceramic CAD-CAM veneers a good treatment option >>

When DIY cosmetic dentistry goes bad >>

Product Spotlight: Request a sample today! >>

News You Can Use:

Improving their smile starts here >>

News You Can Use:

ADA CE courses on esthetics at annual meeting and online >>


Hydrogen peroxide effectiveness, risks for at-home bleaching

Hydrogen peroxide (HP) concentrations of 4% and 10% are both effective for at-home bleaching, but 10% HP increased the absolute risk and intensity of tooth sensitivity (TS). The finding is from a study published in the May/June issue of Operative Dentistry.

Authors designed the triple-blind, controlled, and parallel randomized clinical trial to measure the color change and risk and intensity of TS from at-home bleaching performed with HP gel in concentrations of 4% and 10%. The study’s primary outcome was the absolute risk of developing TS. The secondary outcome was color variation.

Authors randomized all 78 participants into 2 groups: HP 4 and HP 10. All participants were instructed to wear a tray with the bleaching agent for 30 minutes twice per day for 2 weeks. Participants who wore the bleaching tray at least 28 times were considered 100% in compliance with the protocol.

Two calibrated evaluators with agreement of at least 85% determined by weighted Κ statistics recorded the shade of each participant’s teeth at baseline, during treatment (after the first and second week of bleaching treatment), and 1 month after treatment.

Authors evaluated color using Vita Classical, Vita Bleachedguide 3D-MASTER, and a spectrophotometer. They used the middle one-third of the facial surface of the anterior central incisor for shade matching. Authors measured color changes by calculating the change in the number of shade guide units that occurred toward the lighter end of the value-oriented list of shade tabs.

Patients used a numeric rating scale (0-4) and visual analog scale (0-10) to record TS. Authors compared the absolute risks of bleaching-induced TS using the Χ2 test. They used the Mann-Whitney test to compare the intensity of TS from both pain scales. The ΔΕ data were submitted to a 2-way repeated measures analysis of variance, with the assessment time being the repeated factor.

Authors found the adherence to protocol was 88% in the HP 10 group and 85% in the HP 4 group. In the HP 10 group, 25 patients reported some degree of TS during bleaching. In the HP 4 group, 15 patients reported some degree of pain during treatment. Authors also found that the HP 10 produced significantly higher risk of causing bleaching-induced TS than did HP 4.

Two patients from the HP 10 group reported severe TS compared with no patients from the HP 4 group. Authors noted significant differences in TS intensity between the 2 groups based on the 2 pain scales used (P = .02 and P = .03, for numeric rating scale and visual analog scale, respectively).

Color evaluation tools tended to show a higher degree of whitening for the HP 10 group than the HP 4 group in the first and second weeks of bleaching, but authors noted no significant differences between both groups 1 month after treatment.

Read the original article here.


New call-to-action



Zirconia ceramic cantilever resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses offer minimally invasive option to replace missing teeth

Anterior zirconia ceramic cantilevered resin-bonded, fixed dental prostheses provide excellent clinical longevity regardless of the cause of the missing teeth, according to a study published in the October 2017 issue of Journal of Dentistry.

Authors designed the study to measure the long-term success and survival rates of cantilevered zirconia ceramic RBFDPs used to replace incisors. They also wanted to know if the reasons for missing incisors would influence these rates.

A total of 87 patients with missing incisors received 108 anterior cantilevered RBFDPs made from zirconia ceramic. Patients were 61% female and 39% male. The ages ranged from 13 to 78, with a mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of 32 (20) years. A total of 59 patients received 1 cantilevered RBFDP, 21 patients each received 2 cantilevered RBFDPs, and 7 patients missing both maxillary lateral incisors received cantilevered RBFDPs splinted at the midline by connecting their retainer wings to maintain the orthodontic closure of a midline diastema.

Authors grouped patients according to the reason for the missing tooth into 3 categories: congenitally missing (G1), traumatic incidents (G2), and other reasons (G3), including periodontitis, caries, and orthodontic treatment.

The RBFDPs replaced teeth that were congenitally missing in 59.6% of the cases, missing because of traumatic incidents in 13.2% of the cases, and for other reasons in 27.2% of the cases. Authors used the Kaplan-Meier method to measure the success and survival rates of the restorations according to 2 failure criteria: debonding for success and loss of the restoration for survival rates. They used the log-rank test to compare the survival rates of groups for these 2 criteria.

The mean (SD) observation time was 92.2 (33) months, with a minimum of 35 months and a maximum of 185 months. Authors recorded 6 debonding incidents and 1 lost restoration during the observation period. Four of 94 RBFDPs luted with Panavia 21 TC debonded (4.2%), and 2 of 14 RBFDPs luted with Multilink Automix Panavia debonded (14.2%).

The success rate was 92% after 10 years when debonding was considered a complication. The 10-year success rate was 98.5% for G1, 76.9% for G2, and 89.2% for G3. Authors noted no statistically significant difference among the 3 groups (P = .128, log-rank test).

When the loss of a restoration was considered a failure, the 10-year survival rate was 98.2%. Groups G1 and G3 had a survival rate of 100%, whereas group G2 had a survival rate of 90.0%.

“RBFDPs and implants are both minimally invasive treatment options for the replacement of single anterior missing teeth, with comparable levels of longevity and patient satisfaction,” the authors concluded. “However, RBFDPs have the advantage of being an eligible option for young patients (as young as 10 years old), which is contraindicated for treatment with implants. … Moreover, when compared with single implants, RBFDPs are a reversible option, require shorter treatment time, cost less and require less demanding postoperative care.”

Read the original article here.



Composite resin, ceramic CAD-CAM veneers a good treatment option for biocorrosive lesions

Ultrathin occlusal veneers are a conservative alternative to traditional onlays and complete crowns used to treat severe biocorrosive lesions, according to a study published in the July/August issue of Operative Dentistry.

The authors detail a case of a 34-year-old man who sought treatment for dentin sensitivity and dental wear at the Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Materials at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 2015. The case is part of an ongoing clinical trial of patients affected by moderate to severe biocorrosion. Treatment includes the use of composite resin and ceramic computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing materials.

Authors used the bilaminar technique (lingual direct composite veneers with labial ceramic veneers) to restore maxillary anterior teeth and ultrathin computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing ceramic occlusal veneers to restore posterior teeth. Diagnostic casts were obtained from complete arch polyvinyl siloxane impressions.

The patient’s bite was recorded at maximum intercuspal position, and casts were mounted on a semiadjustable articulator. A complete additive waxing was carried out in 2 steps. First, all teeth planned for restoration (maxillary arch: anterior teeth and premolars; mandibular arch: second premolars, first and second molars) were additively waxed, except for the canines. Both waxed models were then duplicated and poured with scannable stone.

Mock-up restorations were fabricated intraorally to evaluate esthetics and vertical dimension of occlusion (VDO). Authors used multisport etching on unprepared enamel to boost retention of provisional restorations in poly(methyl methacrylate) resin. Authors then used splinted bonded provisional acrylic restorations for 15 days to measure the influence of the new vertical dimension of occlusion (+1 millimeter) in facial appearance and muscular comfort.

The 4 posterior sextants were prepared at a rate of 2 per week, starting with the maxillary arch. Additive stone replicas (without canine waxing) were scanned first for correlation and then for the preparations.

At the next appointment, authors milled the ultrathin occlusal veneers from lithium disilicate glass-ceramic blocks. They preferably located the sprue at the nonworking cusps: lingual (inferior arch) and buccal (superior arch). They also inspected the restorations for eventual cracks, marginal chipping, occlusal contacts, and general fit while they were in the precrystallized stage.

Authors rebuilt the palatal surface of the 6 teeth with direct composite under rubber dam isolation. They limited preparation to refreshing the exposed dentin with a diamond bur at low speed (1,500 rotations per minute). After applying a total-etch dental adhesive, authors used freehand composite resin to recover the marginal ridges, cingulum, and palatal fossa.

“It is notable how well patients presenting with moderate to severe loss of tooth structure due to biocorrosion react when minimally invasive reconstructive approaches are proposed to them,” the authors concluded. “Both biological and economic costs are significantly lower compared to traditional and more aggressive options, making the decision-making process easier and the acceptance rate higher. The diagnostic wax-up and mock-up play a key role in this matter, helping both patient and clinician assess the physical aspects of the proposal as well as in the following technical steps of the work flow.”

Read the original article here.



When DIY cosmetic dentistry goes bad

A patient who opted for a quick, do-it-yourself (DIY) approach to a “million dollar smile” found herself in an emergency dental clinic.

The patient, detailed in a letter to the April 27 in British Dental Journal, purchased a clip-on veneer online from a company that promised a “perfect” smile. The veneer featured a home reline material that could be custom fitted to her existing dentition without the need for ever seeing a dentist. When the reline locked onto the patient’s teeth, she sought help from her general practitioner and an out-of-hours dental service before finally seeking treatment at the dental hospital in “extreme physical and emotional distress.”

Dental clinicians there carefully removed the reline and advised the patient not to consider such options in the future. Still, the lure of quick, easy, DIY cosmetic dental products remains.

“We hope this case helps support dentists to challenge the perceived wisdom patients may have in these fast and significantly less expensive alternatives to traditional dentistry,” the authors wrote. “The cost to the [National Health Service] for the patient’s four attendances and the concomitant emotional burden to the patient serve to highlight how such quick fixes can easily become false economies.”

Read the original letter here.


Product Spotlight


Request a sample today!

Estelite Sigma Quick was awarded Dental Advisor’s Top Universal Composite Award for nine years in a row. Order a sample today, and experience why

Learn more


News You Can Use

Improving their smile starts here
If you have patients who are considering veneers or are already ready to improve their smile, give them the ADA brochure, “Dental Veneers:  Improve Your Smile” as an affirmation that they’re making the right choice.  Dental Veneers explains the benefits of porcelain and composite veneers, as well as placement steps and factors to consider before opting for veneers.

Dental Veneers also outlines the reasons to choose veneers, with before-and-after photos and illustrations of veneer placement. The 6-panel brochure is available in packs of 50 from the ADA Catalog. A sample can be viewed here. To order, call 1-800-947-4746 or go to ADAcatalog.org.  The title is available personalized as well.  Readers who use the 18412E code before September 21 can save 15 percent on all ADA Catalog products. 

ADA CE courses on esthetics at annual meeting and online

ADA2018_MeetingLogoJoin us at ADA 2018 for an all-day, hands-on workshop with the American Academy of Facial Esthetics and learn to integrate dermal filler procedures into your practice. Dermal Filler Therapy for Every Dental Practice will provide you with the skills required to diagnose, select treatment plan and inject patients with dermal fillers. Earn 7 hours of CE hours upon completion.

ADA CE Online offers courses on optimal esthetics. Learn from our experts the latest techniques to create perfect smiles. Check out these courses on ADA CE Online and be better prepared for your patients’ esthetic needs.

New call-to-action


What's in this issue?

Hydrogen peroxide effectiveness,
risks for at-home bleaching

Zirconia ceramic cantilever
resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses
es >>

Composite resin, ceramic CAD-CAM veneers a good treatment option >>

When DIY cosmetic dentistry goes bad >>

Product Spotlight: Request a sample today! >>

News You Can Use: Improving their smile starts here >>

News You Can Use:

ADA CE courses on esthetics at annual meeting and online >>




The consulting editor for JADA+ Scan — Cosmetic/Esthetic is Luiz Meirelles DDS, MS, Ph.D., Dentsply Sirona Implant Fellow, Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, University of Michigan School of Dentistry.


JADA+ Specialty Scans and JADA+ Scans
JADA+ Specialty Scans and JADA+ Scans are quarterly newsletters updating dentists on the latest research in selected specialties and disciplines in dentistry. ADA Publishing and the consulting editors from the represented specialties and disciplines aggregate and summarize research from previously published materials, each item attributed to its publication of origin. JADA+ Scan specialties and disciplines include endodontics, healthy aging, oral pathology, orthodontics, pediatric dentistry, periodontics, prosthodontics, radiology, cosmetic/esthetic and osseointegration. View past issues here.

Editorial and Advertising Policies
Any statements of opinion or fact are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the American Dental Association. Neither the ADA nor any of its subsidiaries have any financial interest in any products mentioned in this publication. Any reference to a product or service, whether in advertisements or otherwise, is not intended as an endorsement or as approval by the ADA or any of its affiliated organizations unless accompanied by an authorized statement that such approval or endorsement has been granted.

All matters pertaining to advertising should be addressed to the advertising sales manager, Sales and Marketing Department, American Dental Association, Publishing Division, 211 E. Chicago Ave., Chicago, Ill 60611, 1-312-440-2740, fax 1-312-440-2550. All advertising appearing in ADA publications must comply with official published standards of the American Dental Association, a copy of which is available on request.